Oxford Leadership Journal

The Oxford Leadership Journal is published four times a
year and explores issues related to organizational and societal
change from a variety of perspectives.
You can subscribe for free to the Journal by clicking
here.
OXFORD LEADERSHIP JOURNAL, VOLUME 2 ISSUE 1
JANUARY 2010
Recalibrating For Complexity
Studies show that, 85 percent of the time, mothers across
cultures prefer to hold babies on their left side. The easiest
explanation - the predominance of right-handedness - is not
borne out by investigation - left-handed mothers also tend to
cradle babies on the left side. Instead, it is more a matter
of hemispheric specialisation - the right brain in most
mothers is specialised for emotional information, like crying
and laughter. Because the left side of the body (and the
left eye) are connected to the right side of the brain,
the theory suggests that the left-to-right pathway is
more often the most direct and reliable for sensing the
baby's needs.
Flash back a few thousand years to ancient Egypt. I am told
that, in the carvings of the day, mothers are generally
depicted cradling babies on the right side. Now there are many
possible explanations for this fundamental shift in behaviour
over a few thousand years, but here is my favourite, following
on the hemispheric-specialisation line of thinking. My
suspicion is that the ancient Egyptian women (and men, for
that matter) were never taught to read, so the
modern-day hemispheric specialisation never happened. Their
brains were organised differently than ours.
Flash forward to 2011. Recent research suggests something
very surprising - and this is no joke - that there are
measurable and statistically significant differences in the
brains of self-described conservatives and self-described
progressives. Assuming the research survives scrutiny, it
still leaves open the question of what causes what - does
brain structure influence political choice, or do
political choices affect brain structure?
Now, I am a big believer in the latter, broadly
described as neural plasticity - the tendency of human
brains to adapt to circumstances throughout our
lifetimes. Scientific honesty obliges me to admit that
neither of the above examples says much that is
definitive about neural plasticity, one way or the other.
Still, the likelihood that brains adapt their structure
and function to conditions and training is very
important to consider.
In particular, if literacy would have affected the ancient
Egyptian's hemispheric specialisation, what effect is modern
complexity, turbocharged by the digital revolution, having on
our brains? The question is both very important and very basic
- if the speed and complexity of modern work were causing
changes in your brain (and mind), wouldn't you want to
know about them?
No doubt, modern technology would make the
ancient Egyptian's head literally spin. And my guess is that
the complexity of modern life is making our heads
spin. On a personal level, so much of leading, managing
or simply working in today's society is about
managing the complex web of interaction, communication
and information flow that surrounds our lives.
So what do we mean by complexity? And is it a good thing or
a bad thing? Both questions are critical for any leader
or manager to address, but neither question is easy to
tackle. It is for this reason that all of the articles in this
issue of the Journal pick up on one or another nuance of
managing complexity.
Complex systems do not behave like simple mechanical ones.
In a complex system, big changes in conditions can yield
negligible effects, and small changes in conditions can have
transformative effects. Systems seem to have "a life of their
own," often surprising us. In fact, the world is complex, but
not in the way that chess is complex or an automobile is
complex. One improves performance in chess or car mechanics
through deeper and deeper analysis - understanding the whole
through understanding the parts. Complex systems defy such
analysis - we can do our best to understand them, but in the
end, we have to rely on some mixture of insight, intuition,
imagination, rules of thumb and values. It is a different
playing field with different rules. We all need to recalibrate
our understanding and sensitivities so that we are
more aligned with the non-mechanical realities that surround
us.
Or perhaps our brains are already recalibrating for
that complexity.
Robert Ziegler, Editor
Read Robert Ziegler's profile.
 |
- Ann Graham
Since its founding in 1868, the Tata conglomerate
has operated on the premise that a company thrives on social
capital. Will the model survive being taken to multi-national
scale?
|
 |
- Thomas Homer-Dixon
Our societies' complexity has solved many
problems, but complex systems can also become brittle and
vulnerable to cascading failures. What's a leader to do?
|
 |
- William Ury
Saying "no" well is an art - one that can foster
better outcomes in negotiations of all kinds. The secret? There are
two key yeses for every no.
|
 |
- Sara Schley
A truly transformative change in organisational behaviour
requires reflective leaders who can hold the creative tensions
involved.
|
 |
- Susan Szpakowski
Good strategy - one that copes well with
uncertainty - is elegantly simple with clear
parameters, purpose and success criteria.
|
 |
- Chad Storlie
Like many large organisations, the US military faces
considerable uncertainty. Here are some of their practices and
principles for doing so.
|
 |
- Joshua N. Weiss
You can do everything right in a negotiation, only to be
ambushed at the end by Negotiation Fatigue Syndrome. Here's
how to prevent it.
|
You can read Volume 2, Issue 1 as a consolidated PDF here
(2.2MB)
ARCHIVE
OXFORD LEADERSHIP JOURNAL, VOLUME 1 ISSUE 4
OCTOBER 2010
Do we have what we need?
Many years ago, when my wife was expecting our first child,
I resolved to be ready. It seemed prudent to anticipate a long
period of sleep deprivation, a lot of medium-to-heavy lifting,
and an on-going demand on my time the likes of which I had not
yet known. So during the pregnancy, I stepped up my
exercise routine figuring that being in good shape was
the best preparation I could make for being a father.
That was my thinking at the time, anyway.
Of course, fatherhood didn't turn out exactly as expected.
yes, the demand on my time and energy was - and still is -
significant. But the sleep deprivation was negligible, and as
far as the heavy lifting is concerned, mother Nature doesn't
give you a 25-kilo child to pick up without a few years
of graduated training in advance.
So, all in all, it worked out, and I'm not sure how
useful my pre-delivery training was. Just last week, I
read some more news about the global climate crisis. It seems
that, in the summer of 2010, the Arctic ice cap was the third
smallest in recorded history. (The first and second smallest
ice caps occurred in the last four years.) I'm sure
many of you receive news like this almost every week.
A couple of weeks ago, for example, I read that the toxic
levels in dolphins are now so high that it is necessary and
commonplace for the female to de-toxify herself by nursing her
first calf. This first born often does not survive, but the
mother is now rid of much of the fat-soluble toxins so that
subsequent offspring can be nursed more safely. I don't know
whether to be more alarmed or horrified.
Moreover, it seems likely to me that, over the next couple
of decades, we will see a series of alarms and record-breakers
- this year it's the polar ice cap, maybe next year is the
hottest, the year after could bring bad news from the Greenland ice
shelf or a platoon of hurricanes.
Faced with this kind of news week in and week out, we have in
essence two sane responses: (1) "what can we do to slow,
mitigate or stop this self-destruction?" and (2) "what do we need
to do now to prepare for the kinds of collapse and failure
that now seem likely?" These questions are not mutually
exclusive, and both can be understood as questions of technology,
economy, politics, community or leadership.
While all of these are clearly critical, I am most
interested in the community and leadership
dimensions. Specifically, how do we shift the trajectory of
our systems (question 1) and how do we prepare for
incredible change and uncertainty (question 2)? It
seems that the leaders over the foreseeable future need to
be flexible people who can synthesize the technical
and the social, who can understand and articulate the
complexities we face, and who can look in unlikely
places for transformative solutions. Our future and
present require people of tremendous sophistication,
integrity and courage. The good news is that many such
people already exist. The bad news is we really don't know
if they/we are strong and numerous enough to turn
this thing around.
I hope and trust that this issue of the Oxford
Leadership Journal may contribute in some small way to your
own leadership sophistication, integrity and courage.
You may want to exercise more, as well.
Robert Ziegler, Editor
 |
- Peter Senge
Real transformative change is led by people -
generally on the periphery - who are
relentlessly practical and deeply connected
to spiritual practice. It is our task to
notice, support, leverage and disseminate
these efforts.
|
 |
- Gervase Bushe
Generative questions, generative conversations
and generative actions form the backbone
of Appreciative Inquiry, not just a mere focus on
the positive have all been getting the wrong messages from our
current measures of progress.
|
 |
- Jane Lewis
Positive Deviance assumes that any problematic
situation includes people who surmount the
problem and can share something with the rest of the
affected community.
|
 |
- Lars Thuesen
Even in the highly regarded Danish prison system,
there are problems of stress,
absenteeism, recidivism. Here is a case study
which offers early evidence of the success
of Positive Deviance in addressing some of these
challenges.
|
 |
- Matthew May
Across many disciplines, elegant solutions
are recognised as economical, with lasting
effect. Here are four key attributes of an elegant
solution: symmetry, seduction, subtraction,
and sustainability.
|
 |
- Carol Mase
From a nonlinear systems
perspective, transformative change often
entails instability and under-performance before the
new patterns stabilize outcomes at a new, and higher
level. welcome to the cauldron.
|
 |
- Lenny Lind & Karl Danskin
Meetings can be deadly - presentations followed
by go-nowhere breakout sessions. Here is an elegant
technological solution to all that.
|
You can read Volume 1, Issue 4 as a consolidated PDF here
(1.8MB)
ARCHIVE
OXFORD LEADERSHIP JOURNAL, VOLUME 1 ISSUE 3
JUNE 2010
There's a Hole in the Bottom of the
Sea
When I was a boy at summer camp, we sang a song that seemed
to celebrate the prepositional phrase. Its first stanza had
only two:
There's a hole in the bottom of the sea.
There's a hole in the bottom of the sea.
There's a hole, there's a hole
There's a hole in the bottom of the sea.
Each stanza added another, so the one-liner became:
There's a log in the hole in the bottom of the
sea
Which evolved from stanza to stanza, getting pretty
elaborate:
There's a fleck on the speck on the tail on
the
frog on the bump on the branch on the
log in the hole in the bottom of the
sea
Pretty elaborate and incredibly prophetic of course because
(as I write this) there is a hole in the bottom of the Gulf of
Mexico, and there are flecks and specks and slicks and plumes
all over the surrounding ecosystem. I will confess to being
fascinated and horrified- as I assume many people are-by how
such a small thing, a pipe measured in centimetres,
can wreak such havoc over thousands of square
kilometres of ocean, thousands of kilometres of
shoreline, millions of people, and countless birds, fish
and other marine life. It is as if mother earth
herself was wounded, and no one can staunch the
bleeding.
Also shocking is this disaster's intransigence, defying
humankind's best ingenuity-ingenuity that claims, for example,
to be able to get one seven inch pipe to intersect another
seven-inch pipe under a mile of ocean and a mile of rock. It
is easy to empathise with Mr. Obama's impatience when
he said, "Just plug the damn thing."
The third fascination this monster of a
disaster presents is its slow and steady unfolding. We
can sense that it is only a matter of time before oil
that leaves the pipe reaches the surface, before
underwater plumes are carried far and wide, and
before slicks make landfall in more and more places.
Even if someone just plugs the damn thing soon, the
aftermath will be with us for quite a while.
So these three disaster complexities-the
something- small-affects-something-big dynamic,
the relative inability of humans to manage it, and
the necessity to see things in a bigger time
frame-are going to confront us again and again. They are
built into global climate change, into widespread
economic inequity, and into the huge cultural schisms of our
time.
I think we need to find the acupuncture points-the points of
leverage-that will alleviate our biggest challenges, and we
will probably need many such points. Some will no doubt happen
at the level of behaviour; our everyday actions and decisions,
when multiplied by the millions or billions of other people
doing the same, can have profound effect. Some acupuncture
points will be at the level of our thinking and
assumptions-we will conceive of things differently to obtain
different results. And some points will be at the deepest
level of basic awareness and how we are as human beings.
This issue of the Oxford Leadership Journal is all about
such acupuncture points.
Given the disaster complexities mentioned above, faith in the
existence of acupuncture points is necessary and the search
for them, critical. The Journal, one could say, is predicated
on that faith and dedicated to that search. Please let
us know where your search has taken you, and what you have
discovered.
Robert Ziegler, Editor
 |
Seven Acupuncture Points to Shifting Capitalism
- Otto Scharmer
What shifts are needed for capitalism to function in a
regenerative fashion, accounting for the full ecosystem? A look at
the history provides some clues. |
 |
Measuring Real Progress
- Ron Colman
Why have we been unable to create the kind of society we genuinely
want? One reason is that we have all been getting the wrong
messages from our current measures of progress. |
 |
The Yin and Yang of Creating
- Robert Fritz
In some ways, any creation is sequential-first vision, then
current reality, then action steps. Other aspects happen
simultaneously, one
of which is creating's Yin to its Yang.
|
 |
Leadership: What's love got to do with it?
- Tamara J. Woodbury
Risky as it is, we must find ways to bring love and well-being
back into our organisational cultures if we aspire to move
leadership out of the domain of fear.
|
 |
Reinventing Management
- Julian Birkinshaw
The most spectacular failures-from Enron to GM to Lehman
Brothers-are due in part to failures of management. There are many
management models, and success depends on picking the right
one.
|
 |
The Power of Brands to Create Better Futures
-Santiago Gowland
Especially when your products are consumed billions of times a
day, you have an opportunity and responsibility to build
sustainable values into your brand.
|
 |
Theories X and Y, Revisited
- Matthew Stewart
Fifty years ago, Douglas McGregor clarified some deep assumptions
about the nature of human beings in his articulation of Theory X
and Theory Y. Now it's time to examine assumptions about
relationships. |
You can read Volume 1, Issue 3 as a consolidated PDF here
(1.8MB)
ARCHIVE
OXFORD LEADERSHIP JOURNAL, VOLUME 1 ISSUE 2
MARCH 2010
Introduction from the Oxford Leadership Journal Editor, Robert
Ziegler.
Avatar-not-the-movie
The recent special-effects extravaganza, Avatar, struck more than
a few chords with box-office audiences. In case you are one of the
few who have not yet ventured to see this 3-D science-fiction
marvel, here is a quick plot summary: people from earth are
hell-bent on mining a precious mineral, "un-obtainium", from the
planet Pandora, no matter what the cost to the local inhabitants or
the planet's ecosystem. One of earth's mercenaries, Jake, manages
to infiltrate the local Na'vi tribe, fall in love with the chief's
daughter, and then lead the rebellion against his fellow
earthlings. Avatar is Dances with Wolves, Pocahontas, and The Last
Samurai crossed with the best special effects money can buy (and
the effects are indeed spectacular).
What I found most interesting, though, was the resonant
simpatico this movie established with many of our hopes and fears.
The earthlings' military-industrial complex was never more vulgar.
The Na'vi's feminine leadership was never more evident and strong.
The rift between cultures never more stark. And the connection to
nature never more adorned with audiovisuals.
Maybe I take these things too seriously, but my concern with
Avatar is its implied theory of change, which boils down to a mass
uprising backed up by primitive weaponry and prayer. No criticism
intended, but I think our non-Pandora world also has some pretty
compelling options to offer, some of which are featured in this
issue of the Oxford Leadership Journal.
For example, you don't need to get romantically tribal to
discover a myriad of powerful and practical applications of
feminine leadership and women as leaders. Four writers - three
women and one man - pick up on four distinct threads of the
Feminine.
Corporations are generally not known for their sense of social
responsibility, as Avatar is quick to point out. Two case studies
in this issue illustrate the responsible potential of corporations
- from a multinational giant to a small Canadian biotech
company.
The Avatar leadership is bold, compassionate, fierce and very
sexy. Maybe, like me, you will also find the kinds of leaders and
leadership development described in these articles - the
down-to-earth, collaborative, unsexy, real kind - to be even
sexier.
Robert Ziegler, Editor
 |
Developing Leaders? Developing
Countries?
- Henry Mintzberg
Maybe the notions of development - for countries, for leaders and
for the leaders of countries - need to be re-examined. |
 |
Feminine Principle and Theory U
- Arawana Hayashi
Because feminine principle (not the domain of one gender) invites
us to take a bigger view, it is needed in all phases of any change
process, as Otto Scharmer's Theory U describes. |
 |
Conversational Leadership
- Juanita Brown and Thomas J. Hurley
Organizations and communities are webs of conversation, and no
leader can afford to neglect the architecture needed to foster good
conversations. |
 |
Corporation as CEO
- Judy Johnson and Ella McQuinn
Usually we develop people to get work done. Precision Biologic CEO
Michael Scott turned this around - what if we use work to develop
people? |
 |
The Girl Effect
- Tamara J. Woodbury
Investing in girls - whether in the developing or developed worlds
- has some incredible multiplier effects but nevertheless is rarely
done. |
 |
How Women Mean Business
- Avivah Wittenberg-Cox
There is no glass ceiling. The proportion of women to men drops at
every level of the hierarchy, in all countries, in all sectors.
Here are the steps organizations can take to achieve gender
equity. |
 |
Women and Negotiation
- Andrew Cohn
Women get less in negotiation in part because they ask for less.
What is a man's role when faced with this kind of inequity? |
 |
Business as Change Agent
- Frank Dixon
Wal-Mart is a giant corporation many people love to
hate … but wait, the retail giant is pursuing ambitious
and far-reaching sustainability goals. And when a giant
moves … |
You can read Volume 1, Issue 2 as a consolidated PDF here
(1.6MB)
ARCHIVE
OXFORD LEADERSHIP JOURNAL, VOLUME 1 ISSUE 1
DECEMBER 2009
Shifting Trajectories
By way of introduction, here is a history of apocalyptic thinking:
for the two million years leading up to the 1950s, the only ones
who were concerned about the end of the world were either fervently
religious or insane. By the 1950s, however, the power to destroy
ourselves became apparent thanks to the threat of thermonuclear
war. At the same time, some people began to notice how we were
numerous and ingenious enough to poison ourselves over a somewhat
longer period. Now it seems that those nuclear and ecological
concerns have been nearly eclipsed by the inconvenient truth of the
21st century. In a few short years, global climate change has moved
from possible to probable, from probable to irrefutable, from
irrefutable to it-keeps-moving-faster-than-we-thought.
Our vision of the future has changed irrevocably - there is no
choice but to shift the trajectory of civilisation. And who is bold
enough and smart enough and caring enough to make that shift
happen?
It may as well be us.
To help us in the task at hand, this premier issue of the Oxford
Leadership Journal is brimming with trajectory-shifting
smarts.
Adam Kahane has shared the Introduction to his edgily titled new
book, Power and Love. As a facilitator myself, I am in awe of the
personal honesty and persistence Adam brings to his facilitation
work - disasters, triumphs and everything in between. Meg Wheatley
and Debbie Frieze outline their strategy and experience in scaling
up social innovation, connecting the most promising initiatives
wherever they are found, and eliciting something greater than the
sum of the parts. Julio Olalla probes deeply into the assumptions
of the western mind and begins to point to some hopeful
alternatives. In fact, all the contributors have some unique and
eminently useful handle on shifting trajectories. I expect you will
agree.
So let's work on this together, okay? Share your wisdom and
experience in shifting trajectories through the Facebook or Twitter
links provided or by contacting us directly. And please take a few
minutes to forward this free journal to friends, clients
and colleagues. To be honest, we could use a few more hands.
With gratitude,
Robert Ziegler, Editor
 |
Power and Love
- Adam Kahane
In his book by the same title, Adam Kahane argues that we will not
address our tough societal challenges through powerful
purposefulness alone or through loving inclusiveness alone. We need
both, and not only that, we need the best of both: power that is
not reckless and abusive, and love that is not sentimental. |
 |
Taking Social Innovation To Scale
- Margaret Wheatley & Deborah Frieze
Emergence - the way natural systems develop new behaviours -
provides a model for supporting and magnifying the small-scale
economic, environmental and social innovations we desperately need
on a global scale. |
 |
The Crisis of the Western Mind
- Julio Olalla
To change the direction society is headed, we must understand it
deeply. Julio Olalla explores the roots of Western ways of knowing
and notes the promising signs of movement beyond our
self-destructive path. |
 |
Managing With the Brain in Mind
- David Rock
Research shows that the brain is a social organ, and managers are
well-advised to take into account the social needs of employees if
they want optimum performance. |
 |
Out-of-classroom Experiences
- Mark Jenner
Complement classroom-based leadership development with structured
and intentional experiences outside the classroom. It's harder than
attending a programme, but worth it. |
 |
Five Ways to Misinterpret 'The Art of
War'
- Robert Ziegler
'The Art of War', the 2500-year-old manual on strategy, has a lot
to say about leadership, character, chaos, conflict and
transformative change. That said, the text can also be devilishly
difficult to understand. |
 |
The
Five-Minute OLJ Survey
Each issue, we ask you to share your thoughts on a few key
questions, and we promise not to take more than five minutes of
your time. This month we ask what do you read about leadership -
books, journals, websites - and who has been most helpful and
inspiring? Next issue, you get to see what readers have said. |
You can read Volume 1, Issue 1 as a consolidated PDF here
(1.6MB)
The Oxford Leadership Journal is published four times a year and
explores issues related to organizational and societal change from
a variety of perspectives.
Articles do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher or
editor.
Editorial issues: editor@oxfordleadership.com
Subscription issues: journal@oxfordleadership.com